Should a Religious Person Celebrate Xmas?
There is no Scriptural warrant, precedent, nor precept for remembrance of the day of Messiah's birth as a day of special religious celebration. This is not to say that we shouldn't remember Messiah's birth and its significance, but for religious commemorations or celebrations, we must have Scriptural command or precedent! The fact of the matter is this -- the early assembly did not celebrate Messiah's birth, but such celebration only came into the assembly with the "Religionization" of pagan rites as Catholicism was made the state religion by Constantine in the fourth century A.D. Since the Word of Yahvah does not support the tradition of Xmas, a Religious person's conscience ought not and must not be bound.
The following outline in this sermon describes the origin of Xmas (with its associated pagan customs, symbols, and terminology), details the Scriptural support against celebrating Xmas, attempts to show that celebrating Xmas violates the spirit of every one of the ten commandments, attempts to demonstrate that celebrating Xmas does not fall in the realm of Religious liberty, and attempts to debunk eight of the major rationalizations Religious people put forth for celebrating Xmas.
I. The Origin of Xmas
A. A Long Evolution -- Xmas customs are an evolution from times long before the Religious period -- a descent from seasonal, pagan, religious, and national practices, hedged about with legend and tradition. Their seasonal connections with the pagan feasts of the winter solstice relate them to ancient times, when many of the earth's inhabitant's were sun worshipers. As the superstitious pagans observed the sun gradually moving south in the heavens and the days growing shorter, they believed the sun was departing never to return. To encourage the sun's return north (i.e., to give the winter sun deity strength and to bring him back to life again), the sun deities were worshipped with elaborate rituals and ceremonies, including the building of great bonfires, decorating with great evergreen plants such as holly, ivy, and mistletoe, and making representations of summer birds as house decorations. The winter solstice, then, was the shortest day of the year, when the sun seemingly stood still in the southern sky. Observing the slowdown in the sun's southward movement, and its stop, the heathen believed that their petitions to it had been successful. A time of unrestrained rejoicing broke out, with revelry, drinking, and gluttonous feasts. Then, when the pagans observed the sun moving again northward, and a week later were able to determine that the days were growing longer, a new year was proclaimed.
B. Not Among the Earliest Religious Festivals -- Xmas was not among the earliest festivals of the Assembly. It was not celebrated, commemorated, or observed, neither by the apostles nor in the apostolic assembly -- not for at least the first 300 years of church history! History reveals that about 440 A.D., the Assembly at Jerusalem commenced the celebration of Xmas, following the lead of Roman Catholicism (see I.C.). It was sufficient for the early Religious people that Yahvahosha, their Messiah and Saviour, had been born. They praised Yahvah that Yahvahosha Messiah had, indeed, come in the flesh. The day and the time of His birth had no relevance to them, because Yahvahosha was no longer physically on earth. He had returned to heaven. And it was the risen, exalted Messiah to whom they looked, and that by faith -- not a babe laid in a manger. Yahvahosha Messiah is no longer a baby; no longer the "Messiah-child," but the exalted Saviour of all. And He does NOT somehow return to earth as a baby every year at Xmas-time -- though this is the impression given even in certain hymns sung in Protestant services.
C. The Role of Religion in Ancient Rome -- Seemingly forgotten is the essential role religion played in the world of ancient Rome. But the Emperor Constantine understood. By giving official status to Religion, he brought internal peace to the Empire. A brilliant military commander, he also had the genius to recognize that after declaring Messianic Religion the "state" religion (Constantine forced all the pagans of his empire to be baptized into the Roman Church), there was need for true union between paganism and Messianic Religion. The corrupt Roman Church was full of pagans now masquerading as Religious, all of which had to be pacified. What better way than to “Religionize" their pagan idolatries. Thus, the Babylonian mystery religions were introduced by Constantine beginning in 313 A.D. (and established a foothold with the holding of the Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D.). The Constantine-led Roman Church was more than willing to adapt and adopt pagan practices in order to make Messianic Religion palatable to the heathen. Constantine used religion as a political tool, totally devoid of any true spirituality:
- Pagan rituals and idols took on Religious names (e.g., Yahvahosha Messiah was presented as the Sun of Righteousness [Malachi 4:2] replacing the sun deity, Sol Invictus ).
- Pagan holidays were reclassified as Religious holidays (set apart-days).
- December 25th was the "Victory of the Sun-Deity" Festival in the pagan Babylonian world. In the ancient Roman Empire, the celebration can be traced back to the Roman festival Saturnalia, which honored Saturn, the harvest deity, and Mithras, the deity of light; both were celebrated during or shortly after the winter solstice (between the 17th and 23rd of December). To all ancient pagan civilizations, December 25th was the birthday of the deities -- the time of year when the days began to lengthen and man was blessed with a "regeneration of nature." Moreover, all of December 25th's Babylonian and Roman festivals were characterized by 5-7 day celebration periods of unrestrained or orgiastic revelry and licentiousness.
December 25th was particularly important in the cult of Mithras, a popular deity in the Old Roman Empire. Robert Myers (a proponent for celebrating Xmas) in his book Celebrations, says:
"Prior to the celebration of Xmas, December 25th in the Roman world was the Natalis Solis Invicti, the Birthday of the Unconquerable Sun. This feast, which took place just after the winter solstice of the Julian calendar, was in honor of the Sun Deity, Mithras, originally a Persian deity whose cult penetrated the Roman world in the first century B.C. ... Besides the Mithraic influence, other pagan forces were at work. From the seventeenth of December until the twenty-third, Romans celebrated the ancient feast of the Saturnalia. ... It was commemorative of the Golden Age of Saturn, the god of sowing and husbandry."
In order to make Messianic Religion palatable to the heathen, the Roman Church simply took Saturnalia, adopted it into Messianic Religion, and then eventually many of the associated pagan symbols, forms, customs, and traditions were reinterpreted (i.e., "Religionized") in ways "acceptable" to Religious faith and practice. (In fact, in 375 A.D., the Church of Rome under Pope Julius I merely announced that the birth date of Messiah had been "discovered" to be December 25th, and was accepted as such by the "faithful." The festival of Saturnalia and the birthday of Mithras could now be celebrated as the birthday of Messiah!) The pagans flocked into the Catholic places of worship, because they were still able to worship their old deities, but merely under different names. It mattered not to them whether they worshiped the Egyptian goddess mother and her child under the old names (Isis and Horus), or under the names of the "Virgin Mary" and the "Messiah-child." Either way, it was the same old idol-religion (cf. 1 Thes. 1:8-10; 5:22 -- Paul says to turn from idols, not rename them and Religionize them). Roman's Xmas Day is nothing but "baptized" paganism, having come along much too late to be part of "the faith once delivered unto the saints" (Jude 3).
D. "Religionization" of Pagan Customs, Symbols, and Terminology -- Religionanity had to undergo a transformation so that pagan Rome could "convert" without giving up its old beliefs and rituals. The actual effect was to paganize official Religionanity. "'A compound religion had been manufactured, of which ... Religionanity furnished the nomenclature, and Paganism the doctrines and rights.' The idolatry of the Roman world, though deposed from its ancient pre-eminence, had by no means been demolished. Instead of this, its pagan nakedness had been covered with the garb of a deformed Religionanity" (W.E. Vine). Pagan customs involving vestments, candles, incense, images, and processions were all incorporated into church worship and continue today.
The following customs and traditions associated with Xmas all have pagan/heathen origins. ("Xmas" is the more preferable form for the day, since it at least leaves the name of our Savior out of the heathen observance.) Naturally, Religious people would not keep these customs for such evil and perverse reasons, but the fact of their origins remain -- "the customs of the people are vain" (Jer. 10:3), and should thereby be carefully considered by all who know and love the Saviour:
1. The blasphemous "Messiah Mass" shortened to "Xmas" -- The Roman Catholic "Messiah's Mass" is-a special mass performed in celebration of Messiah's birth. In this massYahvahosha is considered both the priest and the victim, represented by the Catholic priest who offers Him as a sacrifice each time the mass is performed. In offering this "sacrifice," the priest believes he has the power to change the bread and the wine of the Communion into Yahvahosha's literal flesh and blood, requiring the people to worship these elements as they do Yahvah Himself. This is obviously a denial of the gospel, and thereby, a false gospel (a re-doing of the sacrifice for sin -- Heb. 9:12, 24-26; 10:10,12,14). Yet, many who cry out all year long against the blasphemous Roman Catholic system, at year-end embrace Rome's most blasphemous abomination of them all -- Xmas!
2. Nativity Scenes (tainted with paganism) -- Nearly every form of pagan worship descended from the Babylonian mysteries, which focus attention on the "mother-goddess" and the birth of her child. This was adapted to "Mary-Yahvahosha" worship, which then easily accommodated the multitude of pagans "converted" to Religionanity inside Constantine's Roman Catholic Church. If anyone were to erect statues (i.e., images) of Mary and Joseph by themselves, many within Protestant circles would cry "Idolatry!" But at Xmas time, an image of a little baby is placed with the images of Mary and Joseph, and it's called a "nativity scene." Somehow, the baby-idol "sanctifies" the scene, and it is no longer considered idolatry! (cf. Ex. 20:4-5a; 32:1-5a; 9-10a).
3. Xmas Tree -- Evergreen trees, because of their ability to remain green through-out the winter season when most other forms of vegetation are dormant, have long symbolized immortality, fertility, sexual potency, and reproduction, and were often brought into homes and set up as idols.
The full mystical significance of the evergreen can only be understood when one considers the profound reverence the ancient pagans had for all natural phenomena -- "To them, Nature was everywhere alive. Every fountain had its spirit, every mountain its deity, and every water, grove, and meadow, its supernatural association. The whispering of the trees ... was the subtle speech of the deities who dwelt within" (W.M. Auld, Christmas Traditions). This is nothing but nature worship or Animism.
The custom of bringing the tree into the home and decorating it as is done today has legendarily been attributed to Martin Luther. In truth, the modern custom has been lost in obscurity, but almost every culture has some such tradition. For ages, evergreen trees would be brought into the house during the winter as magic symbols of luck and hope for a fruitful year to come, It may also be that the star with which many of today's trees are topped did not originate as a representation of the star that the wise men followed, but rather a representation of the stars to which the ancient Chaldean astrologers looked for guidance.
The first decorating of an evergreen was done by pagans in honor of their deity Adonis, who after being slain was brought to life by the serpent Aesculapius. The representation of the slain Adonis was a dead stump of a tree. Around this stump coiled the snake -- Aesculapius, symbol of life restoring. From the roots of the dead tree, then comes forth another and different tree -- an evergreen tree, symbolic to pagans of a god who cannot die! In Babylon, the evergreen tree came to represent the rebirth/reincarnation of Nimrod as his new son (Sun), Tammuz. In Egypt, this god was worshiped in a palm tree as Baal-Tamar. (Heathen people in the land of Canaan also adopted tree worship, calling it the Asherah -- a tree with its branches cut off was carved into a phallic symbol.) The fir tree was worshiped in Rome as the same new-born god, named Baal-Berith, who was restored to life by the same serpent. A feast was held in honor of him on December 25th, observed as the day on which the deity reappeared on earth -- he had been killed, and was "reborn" on that day, victorious over death! It was called the "Birthday of the Unconquered Sun." Thus, the annual custom of erecting and decorating evergreen trees was brought down to us through the centuries by the pagan Roman Catholic Church -- the paganism of Tammuz and Baal, or the worship of the sun, mingled with the worship of Aesculapius the serpent. Whether erected in private homes or in churches, decorated or not, the evergreen tree is a glaring symbol of this false deity.
4. Xmas Wreaths -- In pagan mythology, evergreen means eternal life and a never-dying existence. Made from evergreens, Xmas wreaths were most frequently round, which symbolized the sun (just as do halos in most religious art). Hence, the round Xmas wreaths stand for an eternal sun, a never-dying or self-renewing sun. In addition, the round form can also relate to the sign of the female, which stands for the regeneration of life. Because of these pagan associations, the Religious church was initially hostile towards the use of wreaths and other evergreen derivatives. But in the same way it Religionized other pagan traditions, the church soon found a way to confer its own symbolic meanings. For example, the sharp pointed leaves of the "male" holly came to represent Messiah's crown of thorns and the red berries His blood, while the "female" ivy symbolized immortality (Sulgrave Manor, "A Tudor Chr-stmas," p. 6). Such wreaths now not only adorn churches at Xmas time, but are also appearing during the equally pagan Easter season.
5. Mistletoe -- The use of the mistletoe plant (which is poisonous to both man and animals) can be traced back to the ancient Druids. (The Druids were pagan Celtic priests who were considered magicians and wizards.) It represented the false "messiah," considered by the Druids to be a divine branch that had dropped from heaven and grew upon a tree on earth. This is an obvious corruption of Yahvah's prophetic Word concerning Messiah, "the Man the Branch," coming from heaven. The mistletoe symbolized the reconciliation between Yahvah and man. And since a kiss is the well known symbol of reconciliation, that is how "kissing under the mistletoe" became a custom -- both were tokens of reconciliation. The mistletoe, being a sacred plant and a symbol of fertility, was also believed to contain certain magical powers, having been brought to earth from heaven by a mistle thrush carrying it in its toes (hence the name). It was once known as the "plant of peace," and in ancient Scandinavia, enemies were reconciled under it (yet another reason why people came to "kiss under the mistletoe"). It was supposed to bring "good luck" and fertility, and even to protect from witchcraft the house in which it hung.
A kiss is also something which is, at times, associated with lust. So the practice of "kissing under the mistletoe" also had roots in the orgiastic celebrations in connection with the Celtic Midsummer Eve ceremony. At the time the mistletoe was gathered, the men would kiss each other as a display of their homosexuality. (The custom was later broadened to include both men and women.) Kissing under the mistletoe is also reminiscent of the temple prostitution and sexual license proliferating during Roman Saturnalia.
6. Santa Claus -- Santa Claus or "Father Xmas" is a corruption of the Dutch "Sant Nikolaas." ("Saint Nicholas" was the 4th century Catholic bishop of Myra in Asia Minor, who gave treats to children; he was canonized by the Roman Catholic Church, "regarded as a special friend and protector of children." The red suit comes from the fact that Catholic bishops and cardinals in Italy wear red.) Santa Claus was also known as "Kriss Kringle," a corruption of the German "Christ Kindl"-- Christ Child. This has to be one of the most subtle of Satan's blasphemies, yet most Religious people are unaware of it.
Originally, the Santa Claus concept came from the pagan Egyptian deity, Bes, a rotund, gnome-like personage who was the patron of little children. Bes was said to live at the North Pole, working year-round to produce toys for children who had been good and obedient to their parents. In Dutch, he was called "Sinter Klaas." Dutch settlers brought the custom to America. In Holland and other European countries, the original Santa Claus was actually a grim personage who traversed the countryside, determined to find out who really had been "naughty or nice." Those who had been acting up were summarily switched. The association of Santa Claus with snow, reindeer, and the North Pole suggests Scandinavian or Norse traditions of the Yuletide season. (In Babylonia, also, the stag [reindeer] was a symbol of the mighty one, Nimrod. The symbolism of antlers worn on the head of a noble leader would demonstrate his prowess as a hunter, and thereby, influence people to follow him.)
Santa is the blasphemous substitute for Yahvah! He is routinely given supernatural powers and divine attributes which only YAHVAH has. Think about it. He is made out to be omniscient -- he knows when every child sleeps, awakes, has been bad or good, and knows exactly what every child wants (cf. Psa. 139:1-4). He is made out to be omnipresent -- on one night of the year he visits all the "good" children in the world and leaves them gifts, seemingly being everywhere at the same time. He is also made out to be omnipotent -- he has the power to give to each child exactly what each one wants. Moreover, Santa Claus is made out to be a sovereign judge -- he answers to no one and no one has authority over him, and when he "comes to town," he comes with a full bag of rewards for those whose behavior has been acceptable in his eyes.
Santa Claus has become one of the most popular and widely accepted and unopposed myths ever to be successfully interwoven into the fabric and framework of Religionanity. It is a fact that Messiah was born, and that truth should greatly rejoice the heart of every Religious person. But the Santa Claus myth distorts the truth of Messiah's birth by subtly blending truth with the myth of Santa Claus. When Religious parents lie to their children about Santa Claus, they are taking the attention of their children away from Yahvah and causing them to focus on a fat man in a red suit with deity-like qualities. All of this teaches the child to believe that, just like Santa, Yahvah can be pleased with "good works," done in order to earn His favor. Also, they teach that no matter how bad the child has been, he will still be rewarded by Yahvah -- just as Santa never failed to bring gifts. Even in homes of professing Religious people, Santa Claus has clearly displaced Yahvahosha in the awareness and affections of children, becoming the undisputed spirit, symbol, and centerpiece of Xmas.
7. Xmas Eve -- "Yule" is a Chaldean word meaning "infant." Long before the coming of Religioianity, the heathen Anglo-Saxons called the 25th of December "Yule day" -- in other words, "infant day" or "child's day" -- the day they celebrated the birth of the false "messiah"! The night before "Yule day" was called "Mother night." Today it is called "Xmas Eve." And it wasn't called "Mother night" after Mary, the mother of our Saviour -- "Mother night" was observed centuries before Yahvahosha was born. Semiramis (Nimrod's wife) was the inspiration for "Mother night," and "Child's day" was the supposed birthday of her son (Tammuz), the sun-deity!
8. Yule Log -- The Yule log was considered by the ancient Celts a sacred log to be used in their religious festivals during the winter solstice; the fire provided promises of good luck and long life. Each year's Yule log had to be selected in the forest on Xmas Eve by the family using it, and could not be bought, or the superstitions associated with it would not apply. In Babylonian paganism, the log placed in the fireplace represented the dead Nimrod, and the tree which appeared the next morning (which today is called the "Xmas tree") was Nimrod alive again (reincarnated) in his new son (sun), Tammuz. (Still today in some places, the Yule log is placed in the fireplace on Xmas Eve, and the next morning there is a Xmas tree!)
Today's Yule log tradition comes to us from Scandinavia, where the pagan sex-and-fertility deity, Jule, was honored in a twelve-day celebration in December. A large, single log was kept with a fire against it for twelve days, and each day for twelve days a different sacrifice was offered. The period now counted as the twelve days between Xmas and Epiphany was originally the twelve days of daily sacrifices offered to the Yule log. (What, then, are we really doing when we send "Yuletide greetings"? Are we really honoring Messiah by sending greetings in the name of a Scandinavian fertility deity? These are the same customs being practiced today as in ancient paganism! Only the names have changed.)
9. Candles -- Candles were lit by the ancient Babylonians in honor of their deity, and his altars had candles on them. And as is well known, candles are also a major part of the ritualism of Roman Catholicism, which adopted the custom from heathenism. Candles approached the Yule log in ritual importance. Like the Yule log, they had to be a gift, never a purchase, and were lighted and extinguished only by the head of the household. Such candles stood burning steadily in the middle of the table, never to be moved or snuffed, lest death follow. The Yule candle, wreathed in greenery, was to burn through Xmas night until the sun rose or the Xmas service began (Sulgrave Manor, "A Tudor Christmas," p. 9). Obviously, candles should have no part in Religious worship, for nowhere in the Restored Covenant is their use sanctioned.
10. Giving of Gifts -- The tradition of exchanging gifts has nothing to do with a reenactment of the Magi giving gifts to Jesus, but has many superstitious, pagan origins instead. One prominent tradition was the Roman custom of exchanging food, trinkets, candles, or statutes of gods during the mid-winter Kalends (the first day of the month in the ancient Roman calendar). This custom was transferred to December 25th by the Roman Church in keeping with the Saturnalian festival and in celebration of the benevolent St. Nicholas. [Is it not the height of ridiculousness to claim that giving one another presents properly celebrates Yahvahosha's "birthday" (not that there is anything necessarily wrong in giving each other presents)? But what are we giving Him, if indeed we are specifically celebrating His incarnation?]
11. Xmas Goose -- The "Xmas goose" and "Xmas cakes" were both used in the worship of the Babylonian "messiah." The goose was considered to be sacred in many ancient lands, such as Rome, Asia Minor, India, and Chaldea. In Egypt, the goose was a symbol for a child, ready to die! In other words, a symbol of the pagan "messiah," ready to give his life (supposedly) for the world. This is obviously a satanic mockery of the truth.
12. Xmas Ham -- Hogs were slaughtered and the eating of the carcass was one of the central festivities of the Saturnalia. Each man would offer a pig as a sacrifice because superstition held that a boar had killed the sun deity Adonis. Hence, the tradition of the Xmas ham on Xmas Day and New Year's Day.
13. Xmas Stocking -- According to tradition, a poor widower of Myra, Turkey, had three daughters, for whom he could not provide a dowry. On Xmas-Eve, "Saint Nicholas" threw three bags of gold down the chimney, thereby saving the daughters from having to enter into prostitution. One bag rolled into a shoe, and the others fell into some stockings that had been hung to dry by the fire. Hence, the beginning of the tradition of the "Xmas stocking" or "boot."
14. Xmas Cards -- The first British Xmas card can be dated back to 1843. The first cards featured pictures of dead birds! Evidently, the popularity of hunting robin and wren on Xmas Day made the dead bird image an appropriate one for "holiday" cards. Often the text of the cards would also have a morbid tone. Later, the cards displayed dancing insects, playful children, pink-cheeked young women, and festively decorated Xmas trees. The first actual Xmas cards were really Valentine's Day cards (with different messages) sent in December. Mass production of Xmas cards in the United States can be traced back to 1875. Initially, the manufacturers thought of Xmas cards as a sideline to their already successful business in playing cards. But the "tradition" of sending cards soon caught on, leading to a very profitable business by itself.
15. Xmas Carols -- What do you suppose the reaction would be by a church's leaders if its pastor were to propose that the following hymns be introduced into the church to commemorate the birth of Meszsiah? After all, the tunes are quite lovely.
Hymn #1 -- A hymn by a Unitarian minister, that does not mention Yahvahosha Messiah and reflects the liberal social gospel theology of the 19th century.
Hymn #2 -- A hymn by an American Episcopal priest, the fourth verse of which teaches Roman Catholic superstition about Messiah coming to be born in people during the Advent season.
Hymn #3 -- A song, the words by an Austrian Roman Catholic priest, the music by a Roman Catholic schoolteacher, containing the Roman Catholic superstition about halos emanating from righteous people, with no gospel message.
Perhaps you would expect the church's leaders to be very upset. It might surprise you to learn that they were upset when they suspected that the pastor might somehow prevent them from singing them! You see, those three hymns were already in the church's hymnals! The pastor did not have to introduce them. The three theologically incorrect "Xmas carols" referred to above are It Came Upon the Midnight Clear, O Little Town of Bethlehem, and Silent Night.
E. European Xmas Traditions -- In the early days of Religionanity, as it moved north and west into Europe, many pagan celebrations were encountered. For example, in the late-6th century in England, the Angles and Saxons were found celebrating Yule. The Religious evangelists thought they would fail in any attempt to rival, suppress, or stamp out such long held customs, so they simply adopted popular dates for their own "special rituals and hallowed services." In other words, it was easier to establish a festival celebrating the birth of Messiah if it conveniently coincided with an existing popular pagan feast day. In this way, the pagan peoples (albeit potential converts to Religionanity) could continue with their usual celebrations at this time of year, but the reason for the merrymaking could be redefined and attributed to Messiah's birth rather than to any pagan rituals. As paganism eventually died out and Religionanity became widespread, Xmas became increasingly more associated with its religious foundations than any others (Sulgrave Manor, "A Tudor Christmas," p. 2).
It was left to the Puritans to denounce everything. For them, Xmas was rightfully part popish, part pagan, and was forbidden to be kept as a holiday or feast day. The attack began in 1644 when the Puritans controlled the Parliament; December 25th was changed to a Fast Day. By 1647, even the Fast Day was abolished as a relic of superstition, synonymous with the Church of Rome. No observation on December 25th was any longer permitted, but the day was to be observed as a normal market-day. ˛Xmas was accurately depicted by such names as the Profane Man's Ranting Day, the Superstitious Man's Idol Day, the Papist's Massing Day, the Old Heathen's Feasting Day, the Multitude's Idle Day, and Satan -- that Adversary's -- Working Day. In those days, any Xmas celebrations would be broken up by troops, who would tear down decorations and arrest anyone holding a service. Some who celebrated it in Europe were also thrown into prison. Because of the riots that broke out following the banning of Xmas, the celebrations and revelry were restored in 1660 by King Charles II, a Roman Catholic (Sulgrave Manor, "A Tudor Christmas," p. 3).
F. American Xmas Traditions -- America's settlers (the "founding fathers" of so-called "Protestant America") rightfully considered Xmas a "popish" holiday. In fact, it was only in the early 1800s that several founding members of the New York Historical Society "invented" Xmas. Before then, it was illegal in colonial Massachusetts to even take December 25th off work. Xmas was forbidden as "unseemly to ye spiritual welfare of ye community." (It was banned in Massachusetts in 1659, and this law remained on the books for 22 years. In Boston, public schools stayed open on December 25th until as late as 1870!) It wasn't until 1836 that any state declared Xmas a holiday (Alabama), and then there were no more state declarations until the Civil War. It was not until 1885 that all federal workers were given Xmas Day off. The so-called Xmas customs and traditions were later concocted more for commercial purposes than for religious.
Quoting from a 12/23/83 USA TODAY article about Xmas: "A broad element of English Religionanity still considered Xmas celebration a pagan blasphemy. The Puritans, Baptists, Quakers, Presbyterians, Calvinists and other denominations brought this opposition to early New England and strong opposition to the holiday lasted in America until the middle of the 18th century." Henry Ward Beecher, a Congregationalist, wrote in 1874 of his New England boyhood:
"To me Xmas is a foreign day, and I shall die so. When I was a boy I wondered what Xmas was. I knew there was such a time, because we had an Episcopal church in our town, and I saw them dressing it with evergreens, and wondered what they were taking the woods in the church for; but I got no satisfactory explanation. A little later I understood it was a Romish institution, kept by the Romish Church."
II. Scriptural Support Against Celebrating Xmas -- Unacceptable Worship
A. 2 Chron. 33:15-17 -- The Israelites had kept the old pagan form (the high places of Baal), but had merely introduced the worship of the Eternal into that form -- a refusal to let go of pagan worship forms (i.e., The Eternal was to be worshiped in the Temple, not on the high places). This was unacceptable worship because the right object of worship was mixed with wrong forms of worship; i.e., the mixing of righteous worship with unrighteous form. Likewise, is not the celebration of Xmas the taking of a celebration established by pagans and for pagans, and then introducing the worship of Messiah into that pagan form?
B. Deut. 12:29-32 – The Eternal warned His people Israel to destroy all vestiges of pagan worship that they found in the "Promised Land." Not only did the Eternal want to prevent His people from being enticed to worship false deities, but He also specifically revealed that He did not want His people to worship Him in the same manner in which the heathen worshiped their deities. We know, therefore, that our Eternal is displeased by practices which profess to honor Him, but which are copied from the tradition of false religions. The command here was to worship The Eternal only in His way, i.e., do only what Yahvah commands -- not adding to Yahvah's commands nor taking away from them. Therefore, is not "putting Messiah back into Xmas," worshiping "Yahvah your Eternal their way"? Is there any command in the Scripture to give special reverence to the Scriptural account of Messiah's birth more so than to any other Scripture, let alone even a suggestion to celebrate or commemorate His birth in any way whatsoever? Yahvah never intended for His people to be imitators of the pagan customs of the world, but has called us to be separate and set apart.
C. Lev. 10:1,2 -- Nadab and Abihu offered strange fire to the Eternal. Is not the celebration of Xmas, with all its pagan symbols and forms, a "strange fire" unto the Eternal, and is not this form of worship contrary to what Yahvah commands?
D. 1 Sam. 15:1-3, 7-9, 21-23 -- Saul disobeyed Yahvah's prophet in order to worship Yahvah in his way. Is not the celebration of Xmas one of man's ways of worshiping Messiah? There is certainly no Scriptural command to offer worship in this manner.
E. 2 Sam. 6:2-7 -- David attempts to transport the ark on a "new cart" instead of using the rings and poles as the Law required (Exo. 25:12-15). Additionally, the "transporters" of the ark were not even authorized to carry it (1 Chron. 15:2, 13-15); i.e., the ark was not only transported in the wrong way, but was transported by the wrong people! Is not the celebration of Xmas the wrong way (pagan forms and tradition) with the wrong people (the heathen of the world join right in with the professing Religious people)?
F. 1 Ki. 12:26-33 -- In order to unify the northern ten tribes of Israel, unrighteous King Jeroboam set up pagan idols, not in place of Yahvah, but as new focal points for directing worship to Yahvah. He even instituted a new festival on a new day; i.e., a new religious holiday of his own choosing. Even though the true Yahvah of Israel was still to be the object of worship in the new religious holiday, both the holiday and the worship were not authorized by Yahvah nor accepted by Him (1 Ki. 13:1-3; 15:29,30). Why? Because the concocted mixture of error with truth constituted false religion! Likewise, is not the celebration of Xmas a religious holiday of man's own choosing, replete with pagan symbols and forms, all under the guise (by sincere Religious people at least) of worshiping the one true Yahvah and Savior? But does not this worship form and system still constitute false religion, and thereby, make it unacceptable to Yahvah? And besides, where in the Scripture do Religious people have the right to add a new set apart day to the so-called Religious calendar, any more than King Jeroboam had the right to add a new set apart day to Yahvah's theocratic calendar?
G. 1 Cor. 8:4-13; Rom. 14:1-13; 1 Cor. 10:14, 18-21 -- These passages concerning Religious liberty are discussed in more detail under Roman numeral IV. [Religious liberty can best be defined Scriptural as "the freedom to engage in practices not prohibited by the Scriptures or denying oneself what is permitted (i.e., a moral choice of self-discipline) in order to be a more effective witness for Yahvah." So the question must first be answered, "Is Xmas permitted?"] Briefly, some claim that Paul is teaching that the participation in pagan forms condemns no one, and therefore, participation in Xmas and its forms, even though arising out of pagan idolatry, is inconsequential. However, Paul nowhere approves participation in acts of idolatry, of which the participation in the pagan forms of Xmas comes dangerously close to doing. Instead, Paul is speaking of the liberty to continue in Jewish days of worship/festival that had been previously ordained under the Scriptural law. There is certainly no liberty to bring outside pagan forms into the church's worship services. Likewise, there is no liberty to Messiahianize Babylonian/Roman pagan set apart days as special days.
Religiou people in the first century assemblies had the liberty to observe Hebrew Scripture set apart days and feasts (days that had previously been revealed by Yahvah) if they were so immature as to do so. The weaker brother, Paul wrote, was at that time not to be censured for continuing to attach some importance to the Hebrew Scripture set apart days, as a clear knowledge of their abolition in Messiah was not yet given to him (the weaker brother). But to observe a pagan set apart day is something this passage does not sanction. They certainly did not have the liberty to regard Babylonian/Roman pagan set apart days (days that were invented by the devil) as special days. Again, that would have been idolatry, worldliness, and perhaps even a form of Satan worship on their part. Therefore, how can the observance of Xmas Day, or any other Babylonian/Roman Catholic set apart day, be a matter of Religious liberty?
Yet when some of us refuse to regard the pagan set apart days as special days, we are the ones often referred to as the "weaker brother" in this matter! Are we opposed to such days because we are "weak in faith"? Faith would be defined as believing what the Word of Yahvah says about a matter and acting upon it. It was by faith that we stopped regarding pagan set apart days as special days. Would we be more mature Religious people if we would start regarding such days again? It would certainly be much easier on our families and us.
III. Xmas and the (Spiritual) Violation of the Ten Commandments (reverse order)
A. Do Not Covet -- Children learn to covet the gifts of others, to drool over the Xmas catalog, to drag their parents endlessly through toy stores, all in the name of "the Xmas spirit."
B. Do Not Bear False Witness -- "Yahvahosha is the reason for the season!" is the Religious battle cry to "put Messiah back in Xmas," when in actuality, there is not only no Scriptural warrant for Xmas, but its roots are in pagan worship systems. Nevertheless, professing Religious people lie to their children about Santa Claus, the supernatural, sorcerous false "deity" of Xmas tells them to trust in a false deity and a lie, and then don't understand why later in life their children won't believe and trust in the true Yahvah, Yahvahosha Messiah.
C. Do Not Steal -- Xmas spending patterns could never stand the test of Scriptural stewardship; i.e., Religious people, in celebrating Xmas, "steal" the Lord's resources by ignoring their proper use; lavishly spend these resources on worthless and useless trinkets (in many cases); and withhold resources from those in need, while at the same time claiming to never have enough money to buy good Religious books, pay for home schooling, or buy Scriptural helps for their children (Religious people could also be helping the spiritually needy by buying and giving them tracts, books, etc.) We "steal" from our families what they need and what we owe them in order to buy gifts for those who don't need them.
D. Do Not Commit Adultery -- At this "special" time of the year, lustful thoughts are actually encouraged; e.g., teens are allowed to go to parties and stay out later, thereby having temptations put in front of them that otherwise wouldn't be there. Xmas parties for adults also encourage evil thoughts through the use of the mistletoe, etc. (According to Matt. 5, such thoughts constitute adultery. At the very least, spiritual adultery is encouraged by the "season.")
E. Do Not Murder -- Envy and hate of my brother (which, according to Matt. 5, is equal to murder) because he has more than me or because he receives a larger Xmas bonus than me, is encouraged at Xmas time. We also tend to spiritually sacrifice our children to the "deity of Xmas" via greed, selfishness, etc.
F. Honor Father and Mother -- Xmas gift-giving is not an honor to parents; the term "exchanging" gifts (i.e., giving in expectation of a return) is a dead give-away of the mockery associated with this tradition.
G. Remember the Sabbath and Keep It Righteous -- Although we recognize that the Eternal's Day (Sunday) is not the "Religious Sabbath," clearly not the day is to be kept for worship and to be observed as such. Yet when Xmas Eve, Xmas Day, or the day after Xmas falls on a Sunday, most churches adjust the Sunday (pagan day) services to accommodate Xmas, usually by canceling the regularly scheduled Sunday (pagan) evening service. Most of its members are too busy or too tired to attend services anyway, if this was the true day forworship.
H. Do Not Take the Lord's Name in Vain -- "Messiah" and "mass" are two words that are totally opposite from one another, and to connect the two is to blaspheme the name of Messiah. By taking a pagan celebration, "Religionizing" it, and calling it a celebration of the birth of Messiah, is most certainly taking the Eternal's name in vain. (A good example of the willingness of the professing church to profane the name of the Eternal would be the title of a popular children's Xmas concert production -- The Divine Ornament. Imagine, identifying our Eternal with a pagan ornament to hang on a pagan tree! What insult! What blasphemy!) In addition, some professing Religious people use religion ("Messiah's birthday") as a cloak to cover the evils of covetousness, idolatry, greed, immorality, etc. -- all excuses to give vent to evil lusts.
I. Do Not Make Yourself Any Carved Image -- Nativity scenes, "pictures" of Messiah, Xmas cards with "pictures" of Yahvahosha, etc., all violate this command. Yahvah has given us His Word, not images, to teach us about Messiah (1 Pe. 1:23; Dt. 4:12, 15-19).
J. Have No Other Deities Before Me -- The “the deity of this world we are not to have before us.
IV. Is a Religious person Decision to Celebrate Xmas a Part of Religious Liberty?
A. Romans 14:1-13 -- This passage is speaking of Jews who were observing the Hebrew Scripture Jewish set apart days/festivals and dietary laws even though they were now believers in Messiah; but they were also judging their Gentile brothers-in-the-Saviour who did not observe the Jewish customs. Likewise, the Gentile Religious people were judging their Jewish brothers who were seemingly caught-up in ceremonial law. Paul was thusly saying, "To you Gentile Religious people -- leave the Jewish Religious people alone, because they are not violating any Scriptural commands by their actions (i.e., it's a "disputable" matter [doubtful or gray area] and not a moral issue). To you Jewish Religious people -- it's okay for you to observe the Jewish festivals and dietary laws because they were given by Yahvah in the Hebrew Scripture, and thereby, are considered to be previously approved worship forms, but don't judge your Gentile brothers, because there is no Scriptural command for either of you to continue to observe these things." (Actually, it wasn't "okay"), but Paul allowed it as an act of an immature/weaker brother [see II.G. above].) If a moral issue is involved (i.e., a practice that is covered in Scripture), then this passage and its application to Religious liberty (i.e., the freedom to engage in practices not prohibited by Scripture) would obviously not apply. And as brought out earlier in this report, the celebration of Xmas appears to be such a moral issue, because its celebration is not only not from Yahvah, but is from ancient paganism itself!
B. 1 Corinthians 8:4-13 -- The Gentile Religious people, who had been raised in an idolatrous system, were having a problem with their Jewish brothers who were eating meat that had been sacrificed to idols. (Apparently, this was the only "healthy" meat available.) Similar to the Romans 14 passage above, Paul says that eating meat that had been sacrificed to idols is not a moral issue, and thereby, is not prohibited. However, Paul does not say that it is okay to go into the pagan temple itself; in fact, in other passages (1 Cor 10:14, 18-21), Paul specifically prohibits getting involved with the pagan feasts. In other words, it's not a moral issue to partake in the byproducts of a pagan religious system (note, however, that there is no indication here that the Jewish Religious people were using the "idol meat" as part of their worship), but it is not okay to partake in the religious system itself (because the corrupt character of the participants would be harmful for believers). Rather, we must be separate from the worldly system (2 Cor 6:14-7:1). Therefore, when items (byproducts) associated with a pagan religious system not only develop religious associations of their own, but have been integrated into what would otherwise be true Religious worship (as the celebration of Xmas has clearly become in our culture), then we should pull away from them so that there is no confusion over our allegiances.
C. Galatians 4:9-10; Colossians 2:16-17 -- Both these passages of Scripture refer to the Jewish feast days under Hebrew scripture law. If Religious people were not even to observe the Hebrew Scripture Feast days -- days that did have divine sanction, for a time -- they certainly don't have the liberty to observe pagan set apart days!
D. James 4:11 -- James is saying that Religious people may only judge a brother on matters determined in Yahvah's Word (i.e., moral issues). If a matter is not covered in the Word, then these are matters of Religious liberty (á la Rom. 14:1-13 and 1 Cor 8:4-13), and he who judges in these areas of Religiou liberty is, in effect, judging and condemning the Word of Yahvah as being an imperfect standard to which the judge, thereby, refuses to submit. On the other hand, since we have clear Scriptural precept that condemns the things that go on around December 25th in the name of Messiah, the celebration of Xmas does not appear to be a matter of liberty, but one of moral conduct.
V. The Right Response
A. Quench Not the Holy Spirit (1 Thes 5:19-22) -- Test all things against the Scripture and line-up beliefs and actions with what is true (i.e., do not treat with contempt the Word of Yahvah). If one is convinced that to celebrate Xmas is sin, then he and his family must not compromise with the world or the church by participating in any Xmas celebrations (Rom. 14:23).
B. Avoid Traps of the Devil:
1. Lack of Zeal -- One who never considers why he does certain things, but he just does them because he always has or because his parents always have; one who acts on emotions rather than on facts.
2. Lack of Truth -- One who does things for good reasons and right motives (i.e., plenty of zeal), but not in truth.
C. Realize that Religious people Celebrating Xmas as the Day of Messiaah's Birth Makes No More Sense than Adding Any of the Following Days as Special Days of Religious Celebration: -- (Remember, the Bible's focus on the birth of Messiah is for the sole purpose of documenting his virgin birth, his incarnation, and the fulfillment of His prophetic Messiahship. Like the tongue-in-cheek suggestions below, one must also remember that there is no Scriptural warrant, precedent, nor precept for the remembrance of the day of Messiah's birth as a day of special religious celebration.)
1. Baptism Celebration -- Why not have three days of swimming parties in the summer in order to celebrate/symbolize Messiah's three days in the grave? We could even pick a time based upon our speculation of when John the Baptist baptized Yahvahosha!
2. Ascension Celebration -- Why not have one day set aside every year for hot-air balloon rides in order to celebrate Messiah's ascension to heaven?
3. Miracle Celebration -- There is considerable Scriptural focus on Yahvahosha’s miracles (even more than on his birth), so why not have one day set aside every year to celebrate the first of Messiah's miracles? And since that was the turning of water into wine (John 2), why not have "Religious people" wine-tasting parties?
D. Avoid the Rationalizations that:
1. "Xmas Provides a Festive Time to Share the Gospel" -- One cannot take something condemned in Yahvah's Word and "use it" to spread the Gospel; neither will Yahvah bless it to spread His Word. Unacceptable worship and the "mixing-in" of unrighteous/pagan forms is surely not the normal means through which Yahvah blesses the faithful. Satan works to blend together his system with Yahvah's system, because when unacceptable worship (paganism) is blended with true worship (Yahvah's truth), true worship is destroyed. In fact, any time one mixes pagan ideas and practices with the pure religion of Messiah, it is condemned in Scripture as the heinous sin of idolatry! Yahvah has always detested taking those things dedicated to idols and using them to worship Him. As a matter of fact, this "special time of the year" is probably more a hindrance to the receptiveness of the gospel message than a help. Much of the celebration observed by our contemporary society deludes people into assuming that Yahvah is pleased, when in reality, He is offended by false religion, pseudo-worship, and alien philosophies. The ecumenical spirit and a counterfeit "love" under the guise of "peace and goodwill among men," more than likely dulls one's sensitivity to his desperate need to repent of sin and be reconciled to a righteous Yahvah.
2. "Xmas is Merely the Honoring of Messiah's Birth" -- Someone says, "I know Xmas is of pagan origin, but I still think it's not wrong for a church to have a special timeof Messiah's birth." But since when did Protestants believe that Religious people have the right to add to the Scripture? Is the church a legislative body? Are we to follow the scripture in our faith and practice, or the thinking of fallible men? If we have the right to add a special Religious day to the Religious economy, then we can add 10,000 other things. Then we will be no better than the false cults and the Roman Catholics who follow heathen traditions! [Besides, celebrating Messiah's birth is a form of worship. But since Xmas is a lie, those who celebrate it are not worshiping in "spirit and truth" (John 4:24).]
3. "All I'm Doing is Putting Messiah Back into Xmas" -- The modern conservative cry to put back Messiah into Xmas is absurd. As detailed earlier in this report, Yahvahosha Messiah was never in Xmas. It's a lie to say He was. He has no part in a lie. When anyone takes the truth and mixes it with a lie, they no longer have the truth. They have changed the truth into a lie. Neither is it possible to take a lie and mix it with enough truth to change the lie into the truth. You still come out with a lie. One may say, "Well, I know it's not the truth, but I'll put Messiah back in Xmas and magnify Yahvah in it then." No, you won't. Messiah never was in Xmas. You cannot change a lie into the truth. It should in reality be called Baal-mass, Nimrod-mass, Tammuz-mass, Mithras-mass, or Mary-mass. Messiah-mass is a lie. Why use a lie as a good time for a fundamental truth (the incarnation) of the Religious faith?
4. "I'm Using Xmas to Witness for Messiah, Just Like the Apostle Paul Did" -- Some say that all they are doing is taking the "truth" from Xmas (i.e., the incarnation of Messiah) and "cultivating" it as the Apostle Paul did (Acts 17/Mars Hill), taking the opportunity of the season to witness to a lost world. This would be fine if these Religious people were actually doing only as Paul did. Paul, in addressing the Greek philosophers on Mars Hill, proclaimed to them that their "unknown god" to whom they had erected an altar, was none other than "the Eternal who made the world and all the things therein." Paul was not intimidated by the pagan surroundings and symbolisms, nor did he berate the Greeks for their error, but merely showed them the truth of the gospel of Messiah.
But do Religious people really use the "opportunity presented by the season" in the same way as Paul used the opportunity of the pagan altar? Do Religious people personally stand in front of their hometown public displays of Xmas (Nativity scenes, etc.) and preach the gospel? To paraphrase Paul, do they say: "Men of Indianapolis, I see that in every way you are very religious; what you worship as something unknown, I am going to proclaim to you"? Do they come out of the public schools, where they have just attended their children's Xmas programs, and preach to the attendees about the true Yahvah who has been grossly misrepresented in the program they have just witnessed?
Hardly. Even to most of those who understand the true origin of Xmas, this "unique time of year" means inviting unbelievers into their homes to gather around the Xmas tree, to enjoy the beauty of the wreaths, absorb the heat from the Yule log, etc., reasoning that they are only using the pagan forms and the pagan festival season as an opportunity to witness. If Paul meant this in Acts 17, he would have met the people in the Athenian temple or in his or their homes, gathering around their idols that he had made it Relious and was now using as a part of his worship. Most of the people who decorate their homes and churches with Xmas trees, holly wreaths, Nativity scenes, etc., all supposedly to be used as "opportunities" via "Xmas coffees," neighborhood "grab bag" gift exchanges, Xmas concerts, etc., are thoroughly convinced that they're doing Yahvah a service. And since they are not involved in the crass secular "commercialization" that the world revels in, but have instead "put Messiah back in Xmas" (so to speak), they reason that all is Scriptural and pleasing to Yahvah.
5. "It Doesn't Mean Anything to Me" -- Many Religious people who routinely make a habit of picking-and-choosing which scriptural commands they will or will not obey, have likewise carried this practice over into a justification for celebrating Xmas. They claim, "but the Xmas tree, mistletoe, Santa Claus, etc., don't mean anything pagan to me, so I'll exercise my Religious liberty and partake in all of it." Obviously, if one were to take such a cavalier approach to the physical world (i.e., "I can drink rat poison because I choose not to regard it as poison"), it would likely lead to a quick physical death. Why, then, do Religious people think they can avoid spiritual harm by ignoring Yahvah's spiritual warnings?
6. "The 'Connection' Has Been Broken" -- There are those who clearly recognize the pagan nature of the various Xmas worship forms and practices. Nevertheless, many of these Religious people claim that because of the long passage of time from their pagan inception to the present (6,000 years?), the "connection" to paganism has been sufficiently diminished to allow the adoption of these forms and practices into our Religious worship and celebration. While it may be true that most symbols have lost their original demonic meaning and significance in a modern society, it is strangely bizarre and ironic that Messiahdom seeks to commemorate Messiah's birth with the faded symbols of Satan. And even though some of Yahvah's people may be naive and ignorant about the source of these things, surely Yahvah is not. Can such things please Him? And think about this -- if it were possible to "disconnect" current practices from their pagan/occultic roots, why does Scripture not provide us any guidelines as to:
(a) how much time is necessary for the "neutralization"/disassociation process to occur; and
(b) which of the hundreds of ancient pagan rites would then be acceptable for adaptation into Religious worship (since some are obviously much more pagan/occultic than others)?
7. "There Are Hundreds of Other Items of Daily Life that Have a Pagan Origin" -- It is said, "Such things as the wedding ring, certain clothing customs, the modern division of time into hours and minutes, the names of the days of the week, etc., all have pagan connections in their origins, so isn't it a contradiction on your part to say that their meanings have sufficiently changed while Xmas's meanings have not?" But we are not saying that their meanings have changed. The question is one of using things of pagan origin in our worship of Messiah. So we would ask the question back, "Which of these pagan items do we focus on to celebrate the birth of Messiah? Or which of these is 'Religionized' and brought into our weekly worship of, or our daily devotion to Messiah, as you do with the pagan forms and traditions of Xmas?" The origin and meaning of a custom, tradition, or form does not take on significance unless it is somehow specifically incorporated into, or lined up with, our worship. As we have already detailed in the section on Religious liberty (Section IV.B.), these rings, clothing customs, etc. would be merely the byproducts of paganism, not paganism itself, and they have developed no religious connotations or associations of their own, as have the Xmas customs and traditions.
8. "Baptism (and Circumcision) Have Pagan Origins and Yahvah Still Gave Their Use in Scripture, So What's Wrong With Using the Pagan Forms of Xmas?" -- This argument is frequently made by pastors who say that to be consistent, those who would have us forbid the forms, symbols, and traditions of Xmas should also be calling for us to abandon believer's baptism; i.e., shouldn't the would-be banners of Xmas be saying, "Since the ancient mystery religions practiced forms of baptism, therefore baptism is a pagan custom and should be outlawed for the believer in Messiah"? This is a strange argument for anyone to make, particularly a theologian (and, in our opinion, reveals a low view of Scriptural admonitions). If baptism were absent from the Scripture, as using pagan forms and traditions to celebrate or commemorate the birth of Messiah are totally absent, there would then be no Scriptural justification for baptism. But Yahvah has not commanded us to celebrate or commemorate Messiah's birth in any way. He has commanded us to baptize (Ac 2:38).
E. Abstain From the Observance of Xmas -- What, then, ought to be the Religious persons response to this and other pagan and Roman inventions? It cannot be denied that they are pagan, pure and simple, from beginning to end. Yahvah gives us specific instructions in His Word: Thus saith the Eternal, Learn not the way of the heathen ... (Jer. 10:2). These words are perfectly clear. What rational options do we have as Scriptural believing Religious people?
VI. Conclusion
The very popularity of Xmas should cause the Religious people to question it. Anyone and everyone can celebrate Xmas without question -- outright pagans, nominal Religious people, and even Buddhists and Hindus. If, in reality, December 25th were a date set by Yahvah to remember the birth of Yahvahosha, there is no doubt that the world would have nothing to do with it. After all, Yahvah has commanded one day in seven -- the Eternal's Day -- to worship Him. Does the world observe it? Of course not. As expected, the world loves Xmas, but hates the Saviour Yahvahosha Messiah (John 15:18, 23-25). It shuns anything pertaining to true religion. Shouldn't the Religion people be just a little suspicious of a celebration in which the whole sinful world can join without qualms?
One way to test the Scripturalness of our practices is to reflect on what we would expect missionaries to teach new converts in a foreign culture. We assume that they would use the Scripture as their guidebook. If they could start new local churches without importing American culture encumbered with Roman Catholicism, liberal Protestantism, and crass commercialism, wouldn't it be wonderful? Missionaries who have urged new converts to forsake all pagan superstitious relics have later been questioned about the apparent inconsistency of their own American Xmas customs. Nationals perceived them as idolatrous even though the missionaries were oblivious to that possibility!
When Xmas is exposed for what it really is, this angers people. It angers Evangelical Protestant people! And there is reason why it does so. When the pagan celebration of Xmas is rooted up, and rejected, then what has become a Protestant tradition is, in effect, being rejected! And that is why people become angry. It began as a Roman Catholic righteous day, and then it became a Protestant religious day. And if anyone dares show it up for what it really is, they face the wrath of the Protestant religious machine. And these days, that can be very ugly.
Xmas is a thoroughly pagan holiday -- in its origin, in its trappings, and in all its traditions. Perhaps we should contemplate the words of Charles Haddon Spurgeon, delivered in a Lord's Day sermon on December 24, 1871:
"We have no superstitious regard for times and seasons. Certainly we do not believe in the present ecclesiastical arrangement called Xmas: first, because we do not believe in the mass at all, but abhor it, whether it be said or sung in Latin or in English; and secondly, because we find no Scriptural warrant whatever for observing any day as the birthday of the Saviour; and consequently, its observance is a superstition, because [it's] not of divine authority. Superstition has fixed most positively the day of our Saviour's birth, although there is no possibility of discovering when it occurred. ...
"It was not till the middle of the third century that any part of the church celebrated the nativity of our Saviour; and it was not till very long after the Western church had set the example, that the Eastern adopted it. Because the day is not known, therefore superstition has fixed it; ... Where is the method in the madness of the superstitious? Probably the fact is that the holy days were arranged to fit in with the heathen festivals. ... We venture to assert that if there be any day in the year of which we may be pretty sure that it was not the day on which the Saviour was born, it is the twenty-fifth of December. ... regarding not the day, let us, nevertheless, give Him thanks for the gift of His dear Son."
And from Dr. H.A. Ironside's Lectures on the Book of Revelation (1920: p. 301):
"It is a lamentable fact that Babylon's principles and practices are rapidly but surely pervading the churches that escaped from Rome at the time of the Reformation. We may see evidences of it in the wide use of high-sounding ecclesiastical titles, once unknown in the reformed churches, in the revival of feast days and church feasts such as Lent, Good Friday, Easter, and Messiah's Mass, or, as it is generally written, Xmas. ... some of these festivals ... when they are turned into church festivals, they certainly come under the condemnation of Galatians 4:9-11, where the Holy Ghost warns against the observance of days and months and times and seasons. All of them, and many more that might be added, are Babylonish in their origin, and were at one time linked with the Ashtoreth and Tammuz mystery-worship. It is through Rome that they have come down to us; and we do well to remember that Babylon is a mother, with daughters who are likely to partake of their mother's characteristics ..."
And, finally, from Alexander Hislop's 1916 classic, The Two Babylons: Or the Papal Worship:
"Upright men strove to stem the tide, but in spite of all their efforts, the apostasy went on, till the Church, with the exception of a small remnant, was submerged under Pagan superstition. That Xmas is a Pagan festival is beyond all doubt. The time of the year and the ceremonies with which it is still celebrated, prove its origin."
We can summarize by saying that nowhere in Scripture are we commanded to commemorate the birth of our Saviour, and Yahvah the Father evidently deemed it unwise to make the date known. Hence, it will always remain unknown and is not to be ceremoniously remembered and celebrated. (In fact, as pointed out in the Ironside quote above, Yahvah has warned us about getting entangled with any special days [Gal. 4:10]). Notice though, that we are commanded to remember Him in His death (but no special day was specified for this either):
"Take, eat; this is My body which is broken for you; this DO in remembrance of Me" (Luke 22:18,19; 1 Cor. 11:23-26).
To commemorate His death is Scriptural, and happens during the Feast of Unleaqvened Bread. To commemorate His birth is non-Scriptural, even extra-Scriptural (Deut. 4:2; 12:32; Prov. 30:6; Rev. 22:19), whether one chooses December 25th or any other day.
If Yahvah had desired us to remember the day of Messiah's birth, He could have left us the precise date. But if He had, He would have vindicated every astrologer in the past 2,000 years. In occult circles, the anniversary of a person's birth is the most important metaphysical day of the year. The Scripture recognizes no such significance. It is intriguing that there are only two birthday celebrations recorded in the entire Scripture and they were both those of unrighteous kings -- and both resulted in an execution (Ge. 40:16-22 and Matt. 14:6-10/Mark 6:21-27)!
The Apostle Paul says: "But Yahvah forbid that I should glory, save in the cross [not the manger] of our Saviour, Yahvahosha Messiah by whom the world is impaled unto me, and I unto the world" (Gal. 6:14). By itself, we find no salvation in the birth of the Saviour Yahvahosha, for salvation was only made possible through His death (i.e., His shed blood) and resurrection. Our focus should be on the cross and our ascended Saviour, not in a cradle.
Those who love Yahvahosha should certainly rejoice that He was born and lived amongst us as a man. But if we truly want to honor Him and bear testimony of who He is, we must stop marrying that blessed gift with the debauchery of paganism. If we want to honor His birth, let it be done as He would have done it: year-round unselfishly serving our fellow man as an unending act of love for our Yahvah. Let us put away all of the mixture of pagan customs and take up His mantle and His pure worship, and show the confused world that there is a difference.
Recent Comments